In my opinion he presents a very fair and balanced approach to the subject, coming out ultimately with the answer of "yes". Here is the conclusion to his sermon:
So what shall we say to these two views? Virtually all the
great pastors and teachers of history that I admire and that have fed me over
the years belong to the first group who believe that signs and wonders were
only for the apostolic age (John Calvin, Martin Luther, John Owen, Jonathan
Edwards, George Whitefield, Charles Spurgeon, Benjamin Warfield, my own father).
But I am not fully persuaded by their case. On the other hand, there does seem
to be something unique about the way God did signs and wonders in the ministries
of Jesus and the apostles.
So what I think I can say for our guidance is this.
On the one hand, we ought to honor the uniqueness of Jesus
and the apostles and of that revelatory moment in history that gave us the
foundational doctrines of faith and life in the New Testament.
On the other hand we ought to be open to the real
possibility that this too might be a unique moment in history, and in this
moment it may well be God's purpose to pour out his Spirit in unprecedented
revival—revival of love to Christ and zeal for worship and compassion for lost
people and a missionary thrust with signs and wonders.
I want to have my keel deep and stable in the once-for-all
biblical revelation of God, and I want to have my sails unfurled to every
movement of God's Spirit upon the deeps.
No comments:
Post a Comment